|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 3 post(s) |
Trance Oskold
Do not disturb Sanctuary Pact
0
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 07:51:00 -
[1] - Quote
It's pretty simple really. In the EVE EULA in the user content section it states:
"CCP may take any action it deems appropriate regarding any User Content, if CCP believes, in its sole discretion, that such User Content violates the EULA or may expose CCP, its licensors and/or its suppliers to liability, damage CCP's relationship with any of its suppliers, licensors, ISPs or other users of EVE, harm anyone or harm CCP's reputation or goodwill."
I'm pretty sure the news this is about to get is going to harm CCP's reputation if they do nothing. Jester's article is already starting to make it's rounds on other news sites, and I just heard CNN might be running a story on it. You can get an idea of what they might say based on the feedback in the comments here: http://massively.joystiq.com/2014/03/25/heres-some-of-the-cyberbullying-that-happens-in-eve-online/
Not looking very good CCP. Not looking good at all. |
Trance Oskold
Do not disturb Sanctuary Pact
1
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 08:02:00 -
[2] - Quote
None of that **** matters. What does matter is this:
"CCP may take any action it deems appropriate regarding any User Content, if CCP believes, in its sole discretion, that such User Content violates the EULA or may expose CCP, its licensors and/or its suppliers to liability, damage CCP's relationship with any of its suppliers, licensors, ISPs or other users of EVE, harm anyone or harm CCP's reputation or goodwill." |
Trance Oskold
Do not disturb Sanctuary Pact
7
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 08:07:00 -
[3] - Quote
I am sure we can all agree on one thing, and that is that this is a pretty crazy thread. |
Trance Oskold
Do not disturb Sanctuary Pact
10
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 08:24:00 -
[4] - Quote
This is also in the EVE EULA in Conduct under "A. Specifically Restricted Conduct" under section three it states:
"You may not use your own or any third-party software, macros or other stored rapid keystrokes or other patterns of play that facilitate acquisition of items, currency, objects, character attributes, rank or status at an accelerated rate when compared with ordinary Game play."
I'd say using TS3 to "facilitate acquisition of items, *CURRENCY*" could be interpreted as a breach of the EULA. |
Trance Oskold
Do not disturb Sanctuary Pact
10
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 08:30:00 -
[5] - Quote
It's pretty simple really. In the EVE EULA in the user content section it states:
"CCP may take any action it deems appropriate regarding any User Content, if CCP believes, in its sole discretion, that such User Content violates the EULA or may expose CCP, its licensors and/or its suppliers to liability, damage CCP's relationship with any of its suppliers, licensors, ISPs or other users of EVE, harm anyone or harm CCP's reputation or goodwill."
AND
This is also in the EVE EULA in Conduct under "A. Specifically Restricted Conduct" under section three it states:
"You may not use your own or any third-party software, macros or other stored rapid keystrokes or other patterns of play that facilitate acquisition of items, currency, objects, character attributes, rank or status at an accelerated rate when compared with ordinary Game play." |
Trance Oskold
Do not disturb Sanctuary Pact
14
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 08:36:00 -
[6] - Quote
Asia Leigh wrote:Big Lynx wrote:
very stubborn point of view. there are ppl in this world who can't defend themselves (Sakhor) and ppl who take advantage out of it (Ero). Everyone who approves or defends that behaviour of Ero's group has a distorted perception of healthy social interaction. period.
And where did I say I support ero and his group of friends? >.> All I said is that the person who got scammed in this case is equally at fault if not more so. Where as a **** victim, robbery victim, or murder victim doesn't have any choice weather or not they become a victim or not, this guy and every idiot who has or will fall for this scam does have a choice. That choice is don't be a greedy bastard...
It's actually more than that now. Since this has been pointed out and there is an audio recording of the event that's been published in many different places online, it's making CCP look bad. They will have to take action of some sort. |
Trance Oskold
Do not disturb Sanctuary Pact
14
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 08:41:00 -
[7] - Quote
Personally I'd just ban them both for a year, but that's just me. |
Trance Oskold
Do not disturb Sanctuary Pact
17
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 08:46:00 -
[8] - Quote
dexington wrote:Foxstar Damaskeenus wrote:I'm 100% expecting a ban for Erotica 1. Even if only half the people are pissed off at him, that is a lot of pissed off people. btw we are also pissed of about the mittani, can we also expect him banned?.... grrrr goons
Speaking of The Mittani- this reminds me a lot of how he did his PowerPoint presentation on what he did to The Wiz, and the fallout that happened from that. People thought it was funny at first, but then realized the torment that was really happening to people in game. |
Trance Oskold
Do not disturb Sanctuary Pact
17
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 08:53:00 -
[9] - Quote
Foxstar Damaskeenus wrote:dexington wrote:Foxstar Damaskeenus wrote:I'm 100% expecting a ban for Erotica 1. Even if only half the people are pissed off at him, that is a lot of pissed off people. btw we are also pissed of about the mittani, can we also expect him banned?.... grrrr goons That's a legit counter point. Are you referring to mittanigate or the CFC turning null in to a blue fest? As far as mittanigate I think he was very apologetic about the whole thing. The Mittani also has the added bonus of being a pretty nice and helpful person other than that one incident. I would also add that the Mittani has social skills and has not been entirely bad for the game. As far as the blue doughnut, that wouldn't be anywhere near bannable but I do know rules changes are being proposed so null could be broken up somehow. Personally I wouldn't compare Mittens to this psychopath. Mit said some crappy things while drunk behind somebodies back, so have I. This Erotica person consciously toyed with someones emotions and inflicted pain for his own amusement.
Regardless- CCP did take action against The Mittani. What do you think that means for Erotica 1? Expect some kind of punishment. |
|
|
|